Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
+3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
06:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
12:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
200 ms
vs.
392 ms
−192 ms
LCP
200 ms
vs.
392 ms
−192 ms
Finished
841 ms
vs.
981 ms
−140 ms
Score
97
vs.
94
+3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 97 | +3 | 94 |
| Speed | 100 | +8 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 248 ms Good | −416 ms | 664 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 168 ms Good | −160 ms | 328 ms Good |
| LCP i | 168 ms Good | −160 ms | 328 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 2 ms | −24 ms | 26 ms |
| TCP connection | 14 ms | ≈ 0 | 24 ms |
| TTFB | 116 ms | −43 ms | 159 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 204 ms | −129 ms | 333 ms |
| Page loaded | 206 ms | −153 ms | 359 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 4 ms |
| TCP connection | 12 ms | ≈ 0 | 21 ms |
| TTFB | 95 ms | −21 ms | 116 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| DOM loaded | 161 ms | −114 ms | 275 ms |
| Page loaded | 173 ms | −139 ms | 312 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Only in scan B (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 664 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| — | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 664 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |