Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
Scan A (current)
94
turbometrics.io
16 Oct 2026 12:00 PM
· Falkenstein
vs.
-3
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
12:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
06:00
97
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
392 ms
vs.
200 ms
+192 ms
LCP
392 ms
vs.
200 ms
+192 ms
Finished
981 ms
vs.
841 ms
+140 ms
Score
94
vs.
97
-3
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | -3 | 97 |
| Speed | 92 | -8 | 100 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 664 ms Needs improvement | +416 ms | 248 ms Good |
| FCP i | 328 ms Good | +160 ms | 168 ms Good |
| LCP i | 328 ms Good | +160 ms | 168 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 26 ms | +24 ms | 2 ms |
| TCP connection | 24 ms | ≈ 0 | 14 ms |
| TTFB | 159 ms | +43 ms | 116 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 333 ms | +129 ms | 204 ms |
| Page loaded | 359 ms | +153 ms | 206 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 4 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| TCP connection | 21 ms | ≈ 0 | 12 ms |
| TTFB | 116 ms | +21 ms | 95 ms |
| Transfer | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 275 ms | +114 ms | 161 ms |
| Page loaded | 312 ms | +139 ms | 173 ms |
Comparison of findings
Findings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
New findings in scan A (1)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 664 ms.
Unchanged (2)
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Server response slightly delayed (Response after about 664 ms) | — |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |