Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
06:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
680 ms
vs.
340 ms
+340 ms
LCP
680 ms
vs.
340 ms
+340 ms
Finished
1.30 s
vs.
976 ms
+325 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 556 ms Needs improvement | −126 ms | 682 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 192 ms Good | −124 ms | 316 ms Good |
| LCP i | 192 ms Good | −124 ms | 316 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 0 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 6 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 8 ms | ≈ 0 | 6 ms |
| TCP connection | 13 ms | ≈ 0 | 18 ms |
| TTFB | 592 ms | +460 ms | 132 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 3 ms |
| DOM loaded | 684 ms | +375 ms | 309 ms |
| Page loaded | 686 ms | +354 ms | 332 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 8 ms | ≈ 0 | 5 ms |
| TCP connection | 17 ms | ≈ 0 | 15 ms |
| TTFB | 94 ms | −54 ms | 148 ms |
| Transfer | 2 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 196 ms | −97 ms | 293 ms |
| Page loaded | 197 ms | −116 ms | 313 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 556 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 556 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |