Scan comparison
Green: scan A is better than scan B, red: scan A is worse. The change is always scan A − scan B.
Scan A (current)
94
turbometrics.io
16 Oct 2026 12:00 AM
· Falkenstein
vs.
0
Filmstrip comparison
Scan A
00:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
Scan B
06:00
94
FCP
LCP
Finished
FCP
340 ms
vs.
680 ms
−340 ms
LCP
340 ms
vs.
680 ms
−340 ms
Finished
976 ms
vs.
1.30 s
−325 ms
Score
94
vs.
94
±0
Scores
| Category | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 94 | 0 | 94 |
| Speed | 92 | 0 | 92 |
| Images | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Caching | 91 | 0 | 91 |
| WordPress | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| Technical | 100 | 0 | 100 |
Core metrics
Lab values from the Mobile profile (390 px). TTFB is measured by the check server and applies to both profiles.
| Metric | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTFB i | 682 ms Needs improvement | +126 ms | 556 ms Needs improvement |
| FCP i | 316 ms Good | +124 ms | 192 ms Good |
| LCP i | 316 ms Good | +124 ms | 192 ms Good |
| CLS i | 0 Good | ≈ 0 | 0 Good |
| TBT i | 6 ms Good | ≈ 0 | 0 ms Good |
| Requests i | 6 Good | ≈ 0 | 6 Good |
| Data volume i | 47.4 KB | ≈ 0 | 47.4 KB |
Page build timing
Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.
Desktop (1440 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 6 ms | ≈ 0 | 8 ms |
| TCP connection | 18 ms | ≈ 0 | 13 ms |
| TTFB | 132 ms | −460 ms | 592 ms |
| Transfer | 3 ms | ≈ 0 | 1 ms |
| DOM loaded | 309 ms | −375 ms | 684 ms |
| Page loaded | 332 ms | −354 ms | 686 ms |
Mobile (390 px)
| Phase | Scan A | Change | Scan B |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS | 5 ms | ≈ 0 | 8 ms |
| TCP connection | 15 ms | ≈ 0 | 17 ms |
| TTFB | 148 ms | +54 ms | 94 ms |
| Transfer | 1 ms | ≈ 0 | 2 ms |
| DOM loaded | 293 ms | +97 ms | 196 ms |
| Page loaded | 313 ms | +116 ms | 197 ms |
Comparison of problems
Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (warnings and errors only).
Unchanged (3)
Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 682 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.
Deductions by category
Which individual points influence the score the most.
| Scan A | Label | Scan B |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ||
| −8 pts | Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 682 ms) | −8 pts |
| Images | ||
| −3 pts | No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) | −3 pts |
| −4 pts | No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) | −4 pts |
| Caching | ||
| −5 pts | Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) | −5 pts |
| −4 pts | No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) | −4 pts |