Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
94 turbometrics.io
20 Oct 2026 7:00 AM · Falkenstein
vs. +12
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 82
21 Oct 2026 7:00 PM · Falkenstein

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 07:00 94
468 ms
FCP
640 ms
LCP
1.1 s
Finished
296 ms
428 ms
634 ms
1.1 s
Scan B 19:00 82
296 ms
FCP
428 ms
634 ms
LCP
1.1 s
Finished
FCP
356 ms vs. 224 ms +132 ms
LCP
356 ms vs. 224 ms +132 ms
Finished
1.056 ms vs. 1.078 ms -22 ms
Score
94 vs. 82 +12

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 94 +12 82
Speed 92 +32 60
Images 93 -4 97
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 762 ms -1.349 ms 2.111 ms
FCP i 356 ms +132 ms 224 ms
LCP i 356 ms +132 ms 224 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 13 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 6 -3 9
Data volume i 51,4 KB -81,0 KB 132,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — ≈ 0 14 ms
TCP connection 22 ms ≈ 0 21 ms
TTFB 181 ms +84 ms 97 ms
Transfer 4 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 397 ms +131 ms 266 ms
Page loaded 421 ms +93 ms 328 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS — ≈ 0 17 ms
TCP connection 10 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TTFB 161 ms +63 ms 98 ms
Transfer 3 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 360 ms +145 ms 215 ms
Page loaded 375 ms +109 ms 266 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (3)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 762 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Resolved since scan B (3)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 2111 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.
Several images detected on the page
HTML, CSS and the images loaded with the page add up to 12 distinct images.
font-display missing in @font-face
3 @font-face rules without font-display detected. Without font-display, text can stay invisible while loading (FOIT).

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−8 pts Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 762 ms) —
— Very high TTFB (Server response approx. 2111 ms) −40 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) —
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) —
— Several images (12 images) −3 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts