← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
82 turbometrics.io
21 Oct 2026 7:00 PM · Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. -12
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 94
20 Oct 2026 7:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 19:00 82
296 ms
FCP
428 ms
634 ms
LCP
1.1 s
Finished
296 ms
428 ms
634 ms
1.1 s
Scan B 07:00 94
468 ms
FCP
640 ms
LCP
1.1 s
Finished
FCP
224 ms vs. 356 ms -132 ms
LCP
224 ms vs. 356 ms -132 ms
Finished
1.078 ms vs. 1.056 ms +22 ms
Score
82 vs. 94 -12

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 82 -12 94
Speed 60 -32 92
Images 97 +4 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 2.111 ms +1.349 ms 762 ms
FCP i 224 ms -132 ms 356 ms
LCP i 224 ms -132 ms 356 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 13 ms
Requests i 9 +3 6
Data volume i 132,4 KB +81,0 KB 51,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 14 ms ≈ 0 —
TCP connection 21 ms ≈ 0 22 ms
TTFB 97 ms -84 ms 181 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 4 ms
DOM loaded 266 ms -131 ms 397 ms
Page loaded 328 ms -93 ms 421 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 17 ms ≈ 0 —
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 10 ms
TTFB 98 ms -63 ms 161 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 3 ms
DOM loaded 215 ms -145 ms 360 ms
Page loaded 266 ms -109 ms 375 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (3)

Server responds slowly
The server response takes around 2111 ms. That slows down page rendering very early on.
Several images detected on the page
HTML, CSS and the images loaded with the page add up to 12 distinct images.
font-display missing in @font-face
3 @font-face rules without font-display detected. Without font-display, text can stay invisible while loading (FOIT).

Resolved since scan B (3)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 762 ms.
Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−40 pts Very high TTFB (Server response approx. 2111 ms) —
— Slightly elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 762 ms) −8 pts
Images
−3 pts Several images (12 images) —
— No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
— No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts