← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
90 turbometrics.io
20 Oct 2026 1:00 PM · Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. -1
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 91
22 Oct 2026 10:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 13:00 90
268 ms
FCP
392 ms
505 ms
LCP
868 ms
998 ms
Finished
268 ms
392 ms
505 ms
868 ms
998 ms
Scan B 10:00 91
240 ms
FCP
399 ms
LCP
840 ms
965 ms
Finished
FCP
384 ms vs. 268 ms +116 ms
LCP
384 ms vs. 268 ms +116 ms
Finished
998 ms vs. 965 ms +33 ms
Score
90 vs. 91 -1

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 90 -1 91
Speed 82 0 82
Images 93 -4 97
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 878 ms -282 ms 1.160 ms
FCP i 384 ms +116 ms 268 ms
LCP i 384 ms +116 ms 268 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 0 ms ≈ 0 17 ms
Requests i 6 -3 9
Data volume i 51,4 KB -83,1 KB 134,5 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 12 ms ≈ 0 8 ms
TCP connection 20 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TTFB 156 ms +69 ms 87 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 250 ms +24 ms 226 ms
Page loaded 338 ms +92 ms 246 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 174 ms +164 ms 10 ms
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TTFB 297 ms +211 ms 86 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 391 ms +158 ms 233 ms
Page loaded 393 ms +139 ms 254 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Resolved since scan B (2)

Several images detected on the page
HTML, CSS and the images loaded with the page add up to 12 distinct images.
font-display missing in @font-face
3 @font-face rules without font-display detected. Without font-display, text can stay invisible while loading (FOIT).

Unchanged (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 878 ms.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−18 pts Elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 878 ms) −18 pts
Images
−3 pts No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) —
−4 pts No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) —
— Several images (12 images) −3 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts