← Back to the scan

Scan comparison

Scan A (current)
91 turbometrics.io
22 Oct 2026 10:00 AM · Falkenstein
Open scan report ⇄ Swap scans
vs. +1
Scan B (comparison)
turbometrics.io 90
20 Oct 2026 1:00 PM · Falkenstein
Open scan report

Filmstrip comparison

Scan A 10:00 91
240 ms
FCP
399 ms
LCP
840 ms
965 ms
Finished
268 ms
392 ms
505 ms
868 ms
998 ms
Scan B 13:00 90
268 ms
FCP
392 ms
505 ms
LCP
868 ms
998 ms
Finished
FCP
268 ms vs. 384 ms -116 ms
LCP
268 ms vs. 384 ms -116 ms
Finished
965 ms vs. 998 ms -33 ms
Score
91 vs. 90 +1

Scores

Category Scan A Change Scan B
Total 91 +1 90
Speed 82 0 82
Images 97 +4 93
Caching 91 0 91
WordPress 100 0 100
Technical 100 0 100

Core metrics

Desktop profile (1440 px). Positive delta (A − B): scan A is worse; negative delta: scan A is better.

Metric Scan A Change Scan B
TTFB i 1.160 ms +282 ms 878 ms
FCP i 268 ms -116 ms 384 ms
LCP i 268 ms -116 ms 384 ms
CLS i 0 ≈ 0 0
TBT i 17 ms ≈ 0 0 ms
Requests i 9 +3 6
Data volume i 134,5 KB +83,1 KB 51,4 KB

Page build timing

Navigation timing from the real page load in the browser.

Desktop (1440 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 8 ms ≈ 0 12 ms
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 20 ms
TTFB 87 ms -69 ms 156 ms
Transfer 2 ms ≈ 0 1 ms
DOM loaded 226 ms -24 ms 250 ms
Page loaded 246 ms -92 ms 338 ms

Mobile (390 px)

Phase Scan A Change Scan B
DNS 10 ms -164 ms 174 ms
TCP connection 14 ms ≈ 0 14 ms
TTFB 86 ms -211 ms 297 ms
Transfer 1 ms ≈ 0 2 ms
DOM loaded 233 ms -158 ms 391 ms
Page loaded 254 ms -139 ms 393 ms

Findings comparison

Problems and warnings compared between the two scans (bad/warning only).

New in scan A (2)

Several images detected on the page
HTML, CSS and the images loaded with the page add up to 12 distinct images.
font-display missing in @font-face
3 @font-face rules without font-display detected. Without font-display, text can stay invisible while loading (FOIT).

Resolved since scan B (2)

Lazy loading is not clearly detectable
Images were detected, but no loading="lazy" on any image element.
No modern image formats detected
No WebP or AVIF image files were detected in the HTML image sources.

Unchanged (1)

Server response can be improved
The server response takes around 1160 ms.

Deductions by category

Which individual points influence the score the most.

Scan A Label Scan B
Speed
−18 pts Elevated TTFB (Server response approx. 1160 ms) −18 pts
Images
−3 pts Several images (12 images) —
— No clear lazy loading (No lazy loading indicators found) −3 pts
— No modern image formats (No WebP/AVIF detected) −4 pts
Caching
−5 pts Caching partly disabled (no-cache, private) −5 pts
−4 pts No clear page cache indicator (No HIT/Age indicators detected) −4 pts